Expert Opinions
More Flexibility for SMEs: Controlling Software Costs with SAM
6 min Reading Time
TL;DR
- Software-Asset-Management (SAM) is not a compliance tool, but a strategic governance instrument – companies that understand their software landscape negotiate on equal footing with SAP, Microsoft, and others.
- SMEs can cut annual software costs by over ten percent through targeted contract optimization – without months-long granular inventory projects.
- A pragmatic entry point is a 90-day cost-cutting initiative that delivers transparency and positions IT departments as strategic enablers.
- According to Gartner, European software spending will grow by 15.6 percent in 2026 – driven by AI investments and escalating cybersecurity requirements.
- Double-digit percentage savings are regularly achievable even with major vendors like SAP or Microsoft – provided reliable usage data and a clear renewal roadmap are in place.
Software costs in SMEs can be reduced by ten percent or more – not through months-long inventory projects, but via focused contract optimization completed within weeks. Software Asset Management (SAM) has long since evolved beyond a compliance utility into a strategic governance instrument that elevates IT departments to equal standing with major vendors.
Today, software influences innovation capacity and competitiveness more than ever – especially in SMEs. Yet growing importance brings growing dependencies: opaque price adjustments, deep vendor lock-ins, and ambiguous data protection rules increasingly pressure companies.
Yet SME IT departments often possess stronger foundations for SAM transformation than commonly assumed. Lean structures, short decision-making paths, and disciplined cost awareness are genuine competitive advantages – if consistently leveraged.
From Service Unit to Strategic Catalyst
The stereotype of reactive SME IT is obsolete. IT departments have become catalysts for innovation and business goals – propelled by a fundamental shift in software’s role. It no longer merely supports business processes; it shapes them.
SME software landscapes now match those of large corporations in complexity: hundreds of applications – including ERP and CAD systems, collaboration platforms, industry-specific solutions, and SaaS tools across sales, HR, and service functions – plus cloud environments, interfaces, integrations, and data platforms.
The diversity of licensing and billing models is expanding rapidly: usage-based billing, hybrid contract structures, and dynamic pricing models significantly increase governance and control demands. The average manufacturing company now spends over €3,000 per employee annually on IT – roughly one-third of which goes toward software.![]()
Traditional cost drivers such as large ERP landscapes are increasingly supplemented by specialized, hard-to-govern departmental solutions. Per Gartner’s forecast, European software spending will rise 15.6 percent in 2026 – and even this figure may prove conservative given accelerating AI investments and mounting cybersecurity requirements.
What initially appears burdensome is, in fact, a major opportunity: the more critical software becomes to value creation, the more strategic its management must be. Whoever masters software actively supports business objectives – while whoever fails to govern it gets governed by it.
$600 billion
Projected global AI infrastructure investment (Goldman Sachs, 2025)
2,000 employees
Focused SAM project saves over 10% of software costs
8,000 employees
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement negotiated below original baseline thanks to SAM data
Three Strategic Pillars for SAM
Practical experience shows that IT departments that have shifted from reactive administration to strategic governance concentrate on three core action areas. Beyond IT, procurement and business units play an increasingly vital role.
Outcome-driven SAM – not just compliance: Robust Software Asset Management extends far beyond license administration or audit preparation. It’s understood as a governance instrument that proactively contributes to value creation – leveraging reliable data on usage and costs, enabling continuous optimization, and delivering forward-looking forecasts for budgeting and investment decisions.
Active and transparent SaaS management: Business units today frequently procure software independently – sometimes outside established processes. Active SaaS management provides visibility into which tools are deployed, how they’re used, what costs they incur, and where corporate data flows. This avoids duplication, reduces security risks, and ensures budgets are spent purposefully. Similar trends are explored in my article on Shadow IT and uncontrolled SaaS costs.
Existing software contracts should be reviewed continuously. Source: Pexels / Pavel Danilyuk.
Contract management that lives up to its name: To achieve real savings, organizations must systematically scrutinize their existing contract portfolio. This includes consolidating vendors, reviewing auto-renewals, clearly assigning responsibilities, and reconciling actual usage against contractual commitments. A cost-oriented overview creates not only financial headroom but also serves as the most effective countermeasure against unwanted vendor dependencies.
The pivotal mindset shift lies in no longer viewing SAM as an end in itself – or merely as audit preparation. SME virtues such as precision, accountability, and cost clarity provide the ideal foundation – and are often harder to implement in large corporations than in SMEs.
Real-World Examples: What Focused SAM Projects Deliver
A healthcare-sector SME illustrates how this works in practice: Not through months-long granular metric collection across all 2,000 employees – but via a focused SAM initiative executed over several weeks, annual software costs were reduced by over ten percent.
Specifically, maintenance contracts no longer required were terminated; automatic price increases were identified and renegotiated; functional overlaps between tools were resolved; departmental needs were aggregated; and low-usage solutions were rigorously challenged. A pragmatic, goal-oriented approach – no large-scale transformation project required.
A second example from Stuttgart-based plant engineering underscores the negotiating power enabled by strong data: An enterprise with nearly 8,000 employees renegotiated its Microsoft Enterprise Agreement. With transparent data and deep insight into leverage points, the contract volume was reduced below its original baseline.
Double-digit percentage savings are routinely achievable even with major vendors like SAP or Microsoft. There’s no reason to simply hand over money. Because many U.S.-based vendors are accustomed to negotiating with corporate structures, unprepared engagement creates gaps – gaps that can be closed. As our article on Microsoft’s and AWS’s promises of digital sovereignty for Europe highlights, cloud sovereignty is now also being debated at the political level across Europe.
Don’t Underestimate Your Size – Negotiating Strength in SMEs
Many SMEs still act too defensively when dealing with large, globally active software vendors. Dependencies are real, vendor lock-ins are increasing, and the perceived power imbalance vis-à-vis global vendors is palpable. Yet this imbalance can be decisively shifted with proper preparation.
“Whoever precisely understands their software landscape, usage patterns, and cost structure doesn’t show up as a supplicant – but as an equal partner.”
Whoever precisely understands their software landscape, usage patterns, and cost structure doesn’t show up as a supplicant – but as an equal partner. Reliable data, clear priorities, and a long-term plan tangibly alter dynamics in vendor interactions. This requires defining contract and renewal strategies two to three years in advance.
In practice, proactive Software Asset Management means systematically analyzing usage patterns, developing robust scenarios for cloud and AI-related costs, and regularly consolidating the organization’s software portfolio while rigorously evaluating genuine alternatives. Our article on 600 Billion Dollars for AI Infrastructure explores the growing significance of AI investments in this context.
Understood this way, Software Asset Management becomes an expression of digital maturity – an integral component of corporate governance. IT leadership, controlling, procurement, and business units gain transparency, planning certainty, and measurable savings across the entire software lifecycle.
Pragmatic Start: How to Get Started
A pragmatic start doesn’t begin with a large-scale project. Begin instead with a focused 90-day cost-cutting initiative that delivers enterprise-wide transparency and makes concrete savings potential visible. This quickly generates internal credibility and trust.
Leverage the AI and SaaS momentum: Bring costs and data flows under control – and position IT as an enabler that empowers business units and actively involves them. Whoever controls AI-related spending avoids the budget surprises many companies are only now encountering.
Consistently evolve your renewal roadmap. Whoever systematically manages contracts – even smaller ones – becomes the central nexus between IT, procurement, and the business. Whoever starts here in a structured way gains not only short-term savings but long-term governance capability.
.faq-section details[open] .faq-arrow{transform:rotate(90deg)}.faq-section summary::-webkit-details-marker{display:none}.faq-section summary::marker{display:none;content:””}
Frequently Asked Questions
▸What is Software Asset Management (SAM), and why does it matter for SMEs?
Software Asset Management encompasses the systematic governance of all software licenses, contracts, and usage within an organization. For SMEs, it’s especially relevant because software accounts for roughly one-third of total IT spending – and uncontrolled SaaS growth, automatic price hikes, and vendor lock-ins pose significant budget risks.
▸How much can focused SAM save?
Real-world experience consistently yields savings of ten percent or more on annual software costs – even with major vendors like SAP or Microsoft, double-digit percentage reductions are attainable. This assumes transparent usage data and contract structures are available.
▸What’s the difference between SAM and pure license compliance?
License compliance ensures an organization uses no software without valid licenses. Strategic SAM goes further: it actively governs spending, optimizes contracts, prevents duplication, and delivers forecasting data for budgeting and investment decisions.
▸How can SMEs adopt strategic SAM without a large project budget?
A pragmatic entry point is a focused 90-day cost-cutting initiative: create transparency around top cost drivers, review auto-renewals, reconcile usage against contractual obligations. No need for months-long full-metric capture – instead, deliver quick, visible savings opportunities.
▸How can SMEs negotiate more effectively with major vendors like Microsoft or SAP?
Through reliable usage data, transparent cost structures, and a clear renewal roadmap. Whoever knows their actual usage and has evaluated alternatives doesn’t arrive as a supplicant. Contract and renewal strategies should be defined two to three years ahead to secure genuine negotiation room.
▸What risks arise from uncontrolled SaaS growth?
When business units procure software independently, shadow IT, duplicate systems, and uncontrolled data flows emerge. This heightens security risks, incurs unnecessary costs, and makes it difficult to maintain oversight of data protection obligations.
▸Which departments should be involved in Software Asset Management?
Beyond IT, procurement, controlling, and respective business units are essential. A successful SAM process doesn’t begin with features or technical requirements – but with business goals, budgets, and strategic priorities – requiring cross-departmental collaboration.
Further Reading
From the MBF Media Network
Header Image Source: Pixabay / Tyli Jura