More Flexibility for SMEs: Controlling Software Costs with SAM
TL;DR Software-Asset-Management (SAM) is not a compliance tool, but a strategic governance instrument – companies that understand their software landscape negotiate on equal footing with SAP, Microsoft, and others. SMEs can cut …
Key Takeaways
- Software Asset Management is not a compliance tool, but a strategic steering instrument – those who know their software landscape negotiate on equal footing with SAP, Microsoft & Co.
- Mittelstand companies can save more than ten percent of their annual software costs through focused contract optimization – without months of detailed data collection.
- A pragmatic start is achieved with a 90-day cost-cutting project that creates transparency and positions IT departments as strategic enablers.
- Software spending in Europe is set to grow by 15.6 percent in 2026 according to Gartner – AI investments and cybersecurity requirements continue to drive costs.
- Even with large vendors such as SAP or Microsoft, double-digit percentage savings are regularly achievable – with solid usage data and a clear renewal roadmap.
Software costs in the Mittelstand can be reduced by ten percent or more – not through months-long inventory projects, but through focused contract optimization over a few weeks. Software Asset Management (SAM) is no longer merely a compliance tool but a strategic steering instrument that puts IT departments on equal footing with major vendors.
Software today determines a company’s innovation strength and competitiveness more than ever – especially in the Mittelstand. However, growing importance also increases dependencies: intransparent price adjustments, deep vendor lock-ins, and unclear data protection rules put companies under pressure.
At the same time, Mittelstand IT departments often have better prerequisites for SAM transformation than is commonly assumed. Lean structures, short decision paths, and strong cost discipline are genuine competitive advantages – when used consistently.
From Service Unit to Strategic Driver
The cliché of reactive Mittelstand IT is outdated. IT departments have long become catalysts for innovation and business objectives – driven by a fundamental shift in the role of software. It no longer simply supports business processes; it shapes them.
Mittelstand software landscapes are now every bit as complex as those of large corporations: hundreds of applications – ERP and CAD systems, collaboration platforms, industry-specific solutions, SaaS applications in sales, HR, or service. Added to this are cloud environments, interfaces, integrations, and data platforms.
The variety of licensing and billing models is growing rapidly: usage-based billing, hybrid contract structures, and dynamic pricing models significantly increase steering and control requirements. The average manufacturing company today spends over 3,000 euros on IT per employee per year – roughly one third of which goes to software.
Classic cost drivers such as large ERP landscapes are increasingly being supplemented by specialized, hard-to-control departmental solutions. According to Gartner, software spending in Europe will grow by 15.6 percent in 2026 – and even that is likely a conservative estimate given AI investments and rising cybersecurity requirements.
What initially looks like an additional burden is in fact a major opportunity: The more important software becomes for value creation, the more strategic its management. Those who have software under control actively support business goals – those who do not manage it are managed by it.
KEY FIGURE
552
Billion Euros
forecasted global AI infrastructure investments (Goldman Sachs, 2025)
KEY FIGURE
2,000
Employees
focused SAM project saves over 10 % of software costs
KEY FIGURE
8,000
Employees
Microsoft EA negotiated below original level thanks to SAM data foundation
Three Action Areas for Strategic SAM
Practice shows that IT departments that have completed the shift from reactive administration to strategic steering focus on three central action areas. In addition to IT, procurement and business units play an increasingly important role.
Outcome-driven SAM instead of pure compliance: Robust Software Asset Management does not exhaust itself in license management or audit preparation. It is understood as a steering instrument that proactively contributes to value creation – with reliable data on usage and costs, continuous optimization, and forward-looking forecasting for budget and investment decisions.
Active and transparent SaaS management: Business units today frequently procure software independently, sometimes outside established processes. Active SaaS management creates transparency about which tools are in use, how they are utilized, what costs arise, and where corporate data flows. Duplicate structures are avoided, security risks are reduced, and budgets are deployed in a targeted manner. Similar developments are described in my article on Shadow IT and uncontrolled SaaS costs.
A contract management system that lives up to its name: Anyone who wants to achieve real savings must systematically scrutinize the existing contract framework. This includes consolidating vendors, reviewing automatic renewals, clearly assigning responsibilities, and reconciling actual usage against contractual obligations. A cost-oriented overview not only creates financial flexibility but also acts as the most effective countermeasure against unwanted vendor dependencies.
The decisive shift in perspective is to stop viewing SAM as an end in itself or mere audit preparation. Mittelstand virtues such as precision, responsibility, and cost clarity create the ideal foundation for this – and are often more difficult to implement in large corporations than in the Mittelstand.
Case Studies: What Focused SAM Projects Deliver
A mid-sized company in the healthcare sector shows how this works in practice. After a focused SAM project lasting only a few weeks, it reduced annual software costs by more than ten percent without months of detailed inventory work across 2,000 employees.
Specifically, unneeded maintenance contracts were terminated, automatic price increases were identified and renegotiated, functional overlaps between tools were eliminated, requirements from business units were bundled, and solutions with low usage were consistently questioned. A pragmatic, targeted approach – without a major transformation project.
A second example from the plant engineering sector in the Stuttgart region illustrates the negotiating power created by a solid data foundation: A company with nearly 8,000 employees negotiated a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement. With a transparent data situation and deep understanding of the pressure points, the contract volume was even reduced below the original baseline level.
Even with large vendors like SAP or Microsoft, double-digit percentage savings are regularly possible. There is no reason to simply leave money on the table. Especially since many U.S. providers are used to negotiating with corporate structures, unprepared appearances create gaps that can be closed. How cloud sovereignty in the European context is now also being discussed at the political level is shown in our article on Microsoft’s and AWS’ Promise of Digital Sovereignty for Europe.
Don’t Make Yourself Smaller Than You Are – Negotiation Strength in the Mittelstand
Many Mittelstand companies still act too defensively toward large, internationally operating software vendors. The dependencies are real, vendor lock-ins are increasing, and the perceived power imbalance with global vendors is tangible. Yet this power imbalance can be significantly shifted with the right preparation.
Those who precisely know their software landscape, usage, and cost structures do not appear as supplicants, but as equals. Solid data, clear priorities, and a long-term plan noticeably change the dynamics in exchanges with vendors. This presupposes defining contract and renewal strategies two to three years in advance.
Proactive Software Asset Management means in practice: systematically analyzing usage patterns, developing reliable scenarios for cloud and AI costs, as well as regularly consolidating the software portfolio and examining genuine alternatives. The growing importance of AI investments in this context is highlighted in our article on 552 billion euros for AI infrastructure.
In this understanding, Software Asset Management becomes an expression of digital maturity – as an integral part of entrepreneurial steering. IT leadership, controlling, procurement, and business units gain transparency, planning certainty, and measurable savings along the entire software lifecycle.
Pragmatic Start: How to Get Started
A pragmatic start does not begin with a large-scale project. Begin with a focused 90-day cost-cutting project that creates transparency across the company and makes concrete savings potential visible. This quickly creates a success that builds internal trust.
Leverage the AI and SaaS momentum: Bring costs and data flows under control and position IT as an enabler that empowers business units and actively involves them. Those who have AI spending under control also avoid the budget surprises that many companies are only now beginning to experience.
Consistently advance your renewal roadmap. Those who systematically manage contracts – even the smaller ones – become the central node between IT, procurement, and business. Those who begin in a structured way here gain not only short-term savings but also long-term steering capability.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Software Asset Management (SAM) and why is it relevant for the Mittelstand?
Software Asset Management encompasses the systematic management of all software licenses, contracts, and usage in the company. For the Mittelstand, it is particularly relevant because software costs make up around one third of IT expenditures and uncontrolled SaaS growth, automatic price increases, and vendor lock-ins represent significant budget risks.
How much can be saved through focused SAM?
Practice regularly shows savings of ten percent or more on annual software costs – even with major vendors like SAP or Microsoft, double-digit percentage savings are achievable. This requires transparent usage data and contract structures.
What is the difference between SAM and pure license compliance?
License compliance ensures that a company does not use software without a valid license. Strategic SAM goes further: It actively controls spending, optimizes contracts, prevents duplicate structures, and provides forecasting data for budget and investment decisions.
How can you get started with strategic SAM without a large project budget?
A pragmatic entry works via a focused 90-day cost-cutting project: create transparency about the biggest cost drivers, review automatic renewals, reconcile usage with contractual obligations. No months-long full capture of all metrics – better to quickly make initial savings potential visible.
How can mid-sized companies negotiate better with large vendors like Microsoft or SAP?
Through solid usage data, transparent cost structures, and a clear renewal roadmap. Those who know their actual usage and have examined alternatives do not appear as supplicants. Contract and renewal strategies should be defined two to three years in advance to create real negotiating room.
What risks arise from uncontrolled SaaS growth?
When business units procure software independently, shadow IT, duplicate structures, and uncontrolled data flows emerge. This increases security risks, causes unnecessary costs, and makes it difficult to maintain an overview of data protection obligations.
Which departments should be involved in Software Asset Management?
Besides the IT department, procurement, controlling, and the respective business units are essential. Not features or technical requirements stand at the beginning of a good SAM process, but corporate goals, budgets, and strategic priorities – this requires cross-departmental collaboration.
Editor's Picks
cloudmagazinShadow IT and SaaS Costs Out of ControlMyBusinessFutureAgentic AI in the MittelstandDigital ChiefsTech Debt as a Business RiskMore from the MBF Media Network
MyBusinessFutureDigital Procurement: Intelligent ProcurementDigital ChiefsTech Debt as a Business RiskImage source: AI-generated (July 2026)
Translated from the German original using artificial intelligence. The German version is authoritative.

