Broadcom‑VMware Channel: Provider Landscape One Year After License Shake‑up

5 min read

More than a year after Broadcom scrapped the old VMware partner program and switched to the new Broadcom Advantage Partner Program, the noise in specialist forums has quietened down. What remains is a transformed cloud provider landscape: some players are expanding their VMware stacks, while others have spun up parallel OpenStack, Proxmox or Nutanix environments.

RelatedReshoring over offshore: How German SMEs are rewiring their cloud supply chains  /  Platform Engineering 2026

This piece isn’t revisiting the pricing debate. It focuses on the question actually on the table in 2026 architecture meetings: Who still delivers managed VMware as a service, who’s actively migrating customers away, and how can a multi-hypervisor strategy be operationally sustained?

Who stayed in the VMware ecosystem

The biggest names have made the transition. OVHcloud prominently features VMware services in its portfolio, IBM Cloud continues to promote IBM Cloud for VMware Solutions, and Rackspace Technology positions itself as a managed services provider for customers wanting to stick with VMware. Microsoft (Azure VMware Solution), Google (Google Cloud VMware Engine), and AWS also maintain their hyperscaler integrations, though the former VMware Cloud on AWS is now sold directly by Broadcom following the acquisition.

Smaller providers, however, have only just completed their homework: re-certification under the new program, bundle mapping (VCF instead of individual products), recalculated pricing, and renewed contracts with existing customers. Many mid-market MSPs in the DACH region that sold white-label VMware until 2023 have since become more cautious about acquiring new customers—the minimum commitment level in the Pinnacle tier is significantly higher than the old VCPP entry point.

Another recurring topic in conversations with channel managers: product consolidation has greatly simplified portfolio discussions with end customers. Instead of individual SKUs for vSphere, vSAN, NSX, and Aria, partners now primarily talk about two bundles. This makes advisory customer conversations more straightforward but leaves less flexibility for components a customer doesn’t need. Those who only used vSphere now effectively pay for features that were optional in the old model.

Who’s Migrating—and Where To?

You can’t pin the exodus down to a single percentage—there’s no reliable public source for that. What you can track, though, are the directions. Three stacks keep popping up in recent tenders and partner announcements.

OpenStack has gained clear momentum thanks to the OpenInfra Foundation. Vendors like Canonical and Mirantis are actively positioning their distributions as landing zones for former VMware customers. The 2024 and 2025 Summits showcased case studies from telcos and universities doing exactly that. The main hurdle remains skills—OpenStack expertise is far less common in the DACH market than vSphere know-how. Those taking this route invest first in training and operations manuals, not licenses.

Proxmox VE is the SME story. The Austrian provider has reported double-digit growth in new customers multiple times in recent months. Its strength lies in its price-performance ratio and a manageable learning curve for admins used to hypervisor maintenance. For enterprise features like stretched metro clusters or granular multi-tenancy, Proxmox still isn’t the top choice. But in environments with a few hundred VMs, standardized workloads, and no strict compliance requirements, the switch can often be done in just a few weeks.

Nutanix targets the other end of the spectrum. Its HCI platform with its own AHV hypervisor is aimed at larger VMware environments looking to consolidate capital costs and footprint. Nutanix has repeatedly stated publicly in 2024 that Broadcom’s existing customers make up a significant portion of its current pipeline. For DACH customers, the key advantages are a solid certification base among major system integrators, an active partner community, and proven references in production environments. The trade-off? AHV is a proprietary hypervisor—migrating away from Nutanix is structurally as complex as leaving VMware behind.

Shifts in ISV Partnerships

ISVs have also responded to Broadcom’s new strategy—alongside service providers. Backup vendors like Veeam, Commvault, and Rubrik have visibly accelerated their roadmaps for Proxmox and Nutanix support. Monitoring providers are expanding their integrations for alternative stacks, as demand in projects has noticeably increased. For customers who, just two years ago, heard “there are no enterprise tools for this” as an argument for VMware, that narrative is now shifting.

At the same time, integration depth isn’t identical. Over 20 years, VMware has built an ISV ecosystem that often goes deeper on critical features like application-aware backup, granular RPO settings, or compliance reporting than the newer integrations of alternatives. This isn’t a dealbreaker—just a point on the due diligence checklist: Which features of today’s ISV landscape are operationally critical for your organization, and how available are they on the target stack?

A third trend: Vendors that previously relied on VMware-only integrations are now actively opening their products to multi-hypervisor scenarios. This applies to workload migration tools as much as software-defined networking and security solutions. This shift will further weaken lock-in effects in the coming years.

Technical Levers for Migration

The actual effort of a migration depends less on the hypervisor itself and more on the surrounding services. Three layers determine how smoothly a switch succeeds.

Storage and networking. vSAN and NSX are the components where a 1:1 replacement is hardest to achieve. OpenStack relies on Ceph, Proxmox on ZFS or Ceph, and Nutanix on its own distributed file system. Each model has different failure modes and operational runbooks. Migrating here typically means rewriting half of your HA and backup processes.

Automation and orchestration. Terraform providers are available for all three alternative stacks, but resource coverage isn’t identical. Ansible modules exist as well. Teams heavily invested in vRealize Automation (now Aria Automation) will either need to remodel their blueprints or turn to tools like Morpheus Data, which natively support multi-hypervisor environments.

ISV compatibility. Backup (Veeam, Commvault), monitoring (PRTG, Zabbix, Datadog), and security agents have the most mature integrations for VMware. The ecosystem for Proxmox is growing, Nutanix has a solid partner list, and OpenStack varies by distribution. Recertifying your backup and monitoring strategy is a work package that’s often underestimated.

Stay or Migrate: The Channel’s Dilemma

The question is rarely posed in absolute terms. In most cases, it’s about embracing a multi-hypervisor reality: core workloads stay on VMware, new projects land on alternative stacks, and over three to five years, the balance shifts.

Channel Reality 2026

Partners currently working with VMware fall into three distinct patterns. First: the specialists. They’ve maintained their status under the new program, primarily serve existing customers, and position themselves as managed-service providers with a strong service focus. Second: the hedgers. They’ve opened a second track—usually OpenStack or Nutanix—and deliberately sell both, depending on the customer profile. Third: the switchers. Mostly smaller MSPs that couldn’t shoulder the new commitment levels and are actively migrating their customers to Proxmox or other platforms.

For IT decision-makers on the customer side, this means one thing: today’s channel partner signals which architectural choice will be easier in the years ahead. Those committed to staying with VMware should seek out a specialist. Those who want to keep their options open should turn to a hedger—and accept that the advice won’t be as hypervisor-neutral as the first slide suggests.

The next turning point isn’t Broadcom—it’s the enterprise contracts expiring in 2026 and 2027. Between now and then, three factors will determine how the provider landscape evolves: how bundle prices shift in the next refresh cycle, how quickly OpenStack skills become available in the DACH market, and how aggressively Nutanix and Proxmox target mid-market MSPs.

What IT Decision-Makers Should Do Now

For organizations still running VMware but unsure about their strategy, three pragmatic steps can replace gut feelings with solid decision-making.

Clarify contract status. When does the current support contract expire? Which products are included in which bundles? Which license positions were repriced in 2024 or 2025? Without this overview, any discussion about alternatives remains purely theoretical.

Cluster workload inventory by migration effort. Some workloads—standard Linux or Windows VMs without special integrations—can be moved to Proxmox or KVM with manageable effort. Others, like vSAN stretched clusters, NSX micro-segmentation, or Site Recovery Manager, are candidates for either staying put or rebuilding from scratch. Three categories suffice: easy to migrate, moderate effort, high rebuild effort.

Run an open-ended partner market check. Instead of only reaching out to VMware partners or alternative providers, it pays to request parallel quotes from two representatives in each camp. The responses won’t just reveal price differences—they’ll show which partners truly have experience in both directions. That’s ultimately more valuable than any price list.

Bottom line: The shift to the Broadcom Advantage Partner Program didn’t trigger a mass exodus from the VMware universe. It sorted the landscape. Those who stay pay more but continue to benefit from a mature platform with a broad partner ecosystem. Those who leave have viable alternatives across three performance tiers—and can find channel partners to guide them. The key is to stop postponing the decision and base the answer on your own workloads, not headlines.

Frequently Asked Questions